Ophthalmology Research - Eye Surgery, Myopia, Cataracts

Ophthalmology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ophthalmology, including details on eye surgery, myopia, cataracts.


Ophthalmology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ophthalmology

Books on Ophthalmology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Comparison of Macular Thickness Measurements between Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Lee G, Lin DS, Pang CP, Lam DS

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 3/F, Chinese University of Hong Kong Eye Center, Hong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon City, nil, Hong Kong; Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California, 92093, United States.

PURPOSE: To compare macular thickness measurements obtained from time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and spectral domain OCT and to evaluate their repeatability and agreement. METHODS: Thirty-five healthy normal subjects were included. In one randomly selected eye in each subject, three serial macular measurements were obtained from time domain OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) and spectral domain OCT (3D OCT, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) by an experienced technician in a random order. Total and regional macular thicknesses obtained by the 2 OCTs were compared. Their agreement was examined with Bland Altman plots. Repeatability [2.77 x Within subject standard deviation (Sw)], coefficient of variation (CVw) (Sw / overall mean), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to evaluate repeatability. RESULTS: Low variability for macular thickness measurements were found in both time domain and spectral domain OCTs. The range of the respective CVw and ICC values were 1.6%-3.2% and 0.85-0.91 for Stratus OCT, and 0.6%-2.4% and 0.92-0.99 for 3D OCT. 3D OCT demonstrated better repeatability for total and regional macular thicknesses (all with p</=0.014). The foveal and total macular thicknesses measured by 3D OCT were significantly greater than those measured by Stratus OCT (both with p<0.001). The spans of 95% limits of agreement for foveal and total macular thicknesses were 33.9microm and 21.3microm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While both time domain and spectral domain OCTs are reliable for macular thickness measurements, spectral domain OCT has better measurement repeatability compared with time domain OCT. Macular measurements obtained from the two OCT systems may not be used interchangeably.

Published 2 May 2008 in Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Ophthalmology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ophthalmology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)



Ophthalmology Books

Cosmetic and Clinical Applications of Botox and Dermal Fillers

Cosmetic and Clinical Applications of Botox and Dermal Fillers